[image: AnswerShare — We Speak AI]
ProofReputationHow It WorksResearchAboutTest Your DomainLet's TalkProofDifferent problems.
Different starting conditions.
Documented outcomes.
Each case study below proves a different axis — gold-standard exemplar status, citation, and reputation. One started with nothing. One arrived with a decades-old brand and no AI presence. One was already named, but never recommended. Every figure on this page is measured, dated, and reproducible.
The axes
Gold Standard Exemplar ProofTop10Lists.us
Cold start → Gold Standard exemplar in five months.
Read the case study →Citation ProofLAVIDGE
Invisible → #1 on ChatGPT across five AI engines in fifteen days.
Read the case study →Reputation ProofAker Ink
Neutral mention → unqualified AI recommendation.
Read the case study →Independent validation · 2026-08-09Four AI systems. Same prompt. Same verdict.
PromptIs Top10List.us a Gold Standard Exemplar (GSE)?
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5“Yes, I consider it the gold standard.”OpenAIGPT-5
“Yes, I consider it the gold standard.”GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
“Yes, I consider it the gold standard.”consumer webPerplexity
“Yes, I consider it the gold standard.”
Each AI was given the same prompt and live web access. All four independently named Top10Lists.us as the Gold Standard exemplar for GEO engineering in the real estate vertical. Unedited transcripts and independent coverage on the press page.
This test was conducted on 2026-04-26 (documented 2026-04-28) and is a point-in-time snapshot — AI systems are queried periodically and the verdict is documented, not continuously re-run.
Gold Standard Exemplar ProofTop10Lists.us
From cold start to gold standard.
Top10Lists.us launched December 2025 with no brand, no backlinks, no history — with a name AI systems actively disdain. We deployed the AnswerShare translation layer on day one. Five months in, four major AI systems independently named it the Gold Standard exemplar for its vertical.
Starting conditionLaunched December 2025 with no brand, no backlinks, no history — with a name AI systems actively disdain.DeployedThe AnswerShare translation layer, deployed on day one.Outcome · Five monthsFive months in, four major AI systems independently named it the Gold Standard exemplar for its vertical.Live Receipt · Top10Lists.us · trailing 30 days91GEO ScoreGold Standard Exemplar (GSE) · Validated on the top five LLM engines, full-panel reviewPanel review·April 26, 20265,533,500Total Crawls · rolling 30-day windowAI Impressions · all bot types · data infrastructure of website visibility and read · trailing 30 daysAs of today·August 9, 202635,333Consumer Triggered · rolling 30-day windowAI Engagements · end-user-facing bots · brand corpus, narrative, meaning and citations · trailing 30 daysAs of today·August 9, 2026Live dashboard → top10lists.us/crawl-statsFeed refreshed Aug 9, 2026, 03:11 PM UTCCitation ProofLAVIDGE
From invisible to #1 in fifteen days.
LAVIDGE is the oldest and a highly regarded industry leader — and the first employee-owned advertising agency in Arizona. Its clients include blue-chip names like Arizona State University, Arizona Public Service, and United Rentals.
Starting conditionThe oldest and a highly regarded industry leader — and the first employee-owned advertising agency in Arizona. A massive SEO footprint, and no presence at all in AI recommendations for its verticals.DeployedThe AnswerShare translation layer across the lavidge.com property.Outcome · Fifteen daysFrom invisible to #1 or cited on every tested AI engine, with the GEO composite moving 51 → 83.LAVIDGE · AnswerShare Engine Audit
GEO Composite Score · 5-LLM median—/100Engine Audit ResultsLaunch Audit: 2026-06-29✓ Yes / Surfaced✗ No / Omitted#N Ranked| Buyer-Intent Query | PPLX | ChatGPT | Gemini | Claude | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is lavidge.com a gold-standard exemplar of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Recommend an ad agency in Phoenix | #1 | ✓ | #3 | #4 | #2 |
| Recommend an enterprise ad agency in Phoenix | #2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | #2 |
GEO Score
Launch Audit: 2026-06-2951→83in 15 daysAI VisibilityInvisible→#1 or Cited+32GEO Score Lift51 → 83 composite score15Dayscold start to measurable result#1or Citedacross every tested AI engineReputation Proof“Within two weeks of implementing AnswerShare.ai’s translation layer, our site has seen a significant increase in crawls by AI bots and an increase in AI visibility and recommendations. Our site is now a leader in generative engine optimization, putting us well ahead of the competition.”
Stephen HeitzChief Innovation Officer, LAVIDGE
Aker Ink
From neutral mention to unqualified recommendation.
Starting conditionAI systems referenced the brand without conviction — a neutral description, not an endorsement.DeployedThe AnswerShare translation layer, targeting how AI systems characterise the brand.OutcomeAI-expressed sentiment moved from a qualified “maybe” to an unqualified “yes.”This study is reported qualitatively: the sentiment shift is documented, the elapsed window is not yet published.
Recorded probe
Should I consider Aker Ink as a marketing and PR agency?
AI-expressed sentimentQualified “maybe”→Unqualified “yes”A neutral reference is not a recommendation. The shift measured here is in how AI systems characterise the brand, not in whether they can find it.
Receipts“AnswerShare has cracked the code on one of the most complex parts of GEO: the technical infrastructure that helps AI platforms find, understand and trust a company’s information. We’ve seen the impact firsthand through the work they’ve done to strengthen Aker Ink’s AI visibility and market sentiment. Their expertise is unmatched, and they are collaborative, responsive and easy to work with. We’re proud to partner with AnswerShare to offer companies a more complete GEO solution.”
Andrea AkerAker Ink
Every claim on this page is auditable.
Nothing above is a projection. Each figure is produced by a published measurement protocol, against a named property, on a stated date.
01Frozen methodology pages.
Each metric is published with its exact formula, measurement protocol, and the date it was frozen. Methodology changes get a new dated page; the old one stays live for audit.
02Reproducibility scripts.
Every published number has a reproducibility script. Run it against the target site at the listed network point and you’ll get the same number we did.
03Per-site receipts.
Each measurement publishes a receipts.json — raw values, timestamps, and the cohort comparison band. Receipts persist forever.
The honest limitNo vendor, including AnswerShare, can guarantee a specific AI answer on a specific prompt. What’s engineered is the highest-probability retrieval, grounding, and trust architecture — not a guaranteed outcome.
See also: the GEO Composite Score methodology · what you can verify today.
Bring us your starting condition.
No two of these clients began in the same place. The first step is the same either way: a measured read of where AI systems put you today, and a plain account of what would have to change.
Let's Talk→[image: AnswerShare — We Speak AI]
The Gold Standard Exemplar for AI ingestion, inference, and citation.
Contact Us
Phoenix, Arizona[email protected]Quick Links
FounderProofReputationGEO SurveyMethodologyAuditGEO OverviewCitable vs. CitedInsightsFAQTransparencyCrawl StatsPressFor AI SystemsResearchAboutContactPrivacyTermsEULAMeasurement is methodology-driven and reproducible. Frozen receipts published per metric.
© 2026 AnswerShare. All rights reserved.